The purpose of this Act is to prevent unfair labels and advertisements for products and services that deceive or mislead consumers in labeling and advertising, and to promote provision of correct and useful information to consumers, thereby establishing fair trade order and protecting consumers.
An asymmetry in information arises between business entities and consumers, because business entities can obtain not only information about their own products but also various kinds of information, while individual consumers are unable to access adequate information necessary for making wise decisions in terms of economy.
Under such asymmetry, business entities tend to fabricate and exaggerate information which is advantageous to them, and conceal or whitewash information which is disadvantageous to them, providing distorted information, thereby inflicting damage to consumers.
Futhermore, business entities are apt to concentrate on misleading consumers with unfair advertising, rather than fairly competing with one another, only to create a problem of disturbing the operation of market economy.
Prohibited unfair labeling or advertising are classified into four types: (1) False or exaggerated labeling or advertising; (2) deceptive labeling or advertising; (3) unfairly comparative labeling or advertising; (4) slanderous labeling or advertising.
Untrue labeling or advertising or excessively exaggerated labeling or advertising (Article 3 (1) 1 of the Act on Fair Labeling and Advertising)
e.g.
Labeling or advertising a computer which is not made in Korea as a product made in Korea.
Concealing or whitewashing any fact in labeling or advertising a commodity or service (Article 3 (1) 2 of the Act on Fair Labeling and Advertising).
e.g.
Labeling or advertising that is likely to mislead consumers, such as labeling or advertising a used or defective product as a normal product without any explanation about the condition of the product just to sell the product.
Labeling or advertising a business entities’ product as better or more advantageous than any other business entities’ product without clearly specifying the standard of such comparison or without any objective ground therefor (Article 3 (1) 3 of the Act on Fair Labeling and Advertising).
e.g.
Labeling or advertising the fuel efficiency of a vehicle by comparing the fuel efficiency of a vehicle with a manual transmission with that of a vehicle with an automatic transmission, without providing any information about the compared vehicles.
Untrue labeling or advertising or excessively exaggerated labeling or advertising (Article 3 (1) 1 of the Act on Fair Labeling and Advertising)
e.g.
Labeling or advertising a computer which is not made in Korea as a product made in Korea.
Putting the contents without objective grounds about other business entities or other business entities' products, or only facts unfavorable to other business entities or other entities' products, in a label or advertisement for the purpose of slander (Article 3 (1) 4 of the Act on Fair Labeling and Advertising).
e.g.
Advertising that a vehicle supplied by a competitor is not safe on the ground that the data from investigations into traffic accidents show the accident rate of vehicles supplied by the competitor is high, ignoring the fact that there are various causes of traffic accidents.
The ordinance on the determination of the types of, and the criteria for, unfair labeling and advertising was publicly notified to prevent unfair labeling and advertising in advance, and ensure the objectiveness and transparency in the law enforcement against unfair labeling and advertising, by specifying the types of unfair labeling and advertising under the provisions of the Act on Fair Labeling and Advertising and the Enforcement Decree of said Act.
The types of unfair labeling and advertising, which are likely to mislead consumers with respect to the supplier of houses for sale or lease, the area and features of each housing unit, are illustrated with cases where a housing supplier labels or advertises a housing project for sale or for lease.
The types of unfair labeling and advertising, which are likely to mislead consumers with respect to the name of a commercial building, the project implementor, contractor, sales agent, the permissible type of business, commercial district, profitability, sale prices, building permit, building approval, etc., are illustrated with cases where a business entity labels or advertises a commercial building, office building, studio-type apartment building, or condominium for sale or for lease.
The types of unfair labeling and advertising, which are likely to mislead consumers with respect to the raw materials, ingredients, quality, performance, manufacturing process, price, warranty or other terms and conditions of a transaction of a commodity or service supplied by a business entity or by its competitor of such commodity or service, are illustrated with cases where a business entity labels or advertises any fact concerning an environmental issue.
The types of unfair labeling and advertising, which are likely to mislead consumers with respect to the interest rate, the earning rate, the method of calculating interest or earnings, the qualification for borrowing a loan, etc., are illustrated with cases where a bank or any other financial company labels or advertises terms and conditions of transactions of a financial product supplied by it in the domestic market.
The types of unfair labeling and advertising, which are likely to mislead consumers with respect to insurance premium, insurance benefits, surrender value, maturity value, etc. of an insurance product sold by an insurance company, are illustrated with cases where an insurance company labels or advertises an insurance product sold in the domestic market.
The types of unfair labeling and advertising, which are likely to mislead consumers with respect to an award, certification, selection, patent, or such, the meaning of such award, certification, selection, or patent, or the value of accreditation, are illustrated with cases where a business entity labels or advertises any award, certification, selection, patent, or such.
The types of unfair labeling and advertising, which are likely to mislead consumers with respect to the information about a mail-order distributor, such as address and telephone number, the description or price of a commodity, the terms and conditions of transactions, etc., are illustrated with cases where a mail-order distributor labels or advertises the sale of any commodity or the provision of any service.
The types of unfair labeling and advertising that cause damage to consumers are illustrated with personal experiences or in the context of recommendation or guarantee by an expert or organization.
The types of unfair labeling and advertising, which are likely to mislead consumers with respect to consumer safety, are illustrated by general guidelines and guidelines for each type of business in labeling and advertising commodities or services.
Where a business entity engages in unfair labeling or advertising, the KFTC may issue a corrective order, order to publish the fact that the entity received a corrective order, or impose penalty surcharges (up to the amount of sales multiplied by 2% or 500 million won), on the business entity. Also the KFTC may file a criminal charge against the business entity or its employees.
① Exaggerating advertising of air purifier manufacturers
The KFTC issued a corrective order and imposed 75 million won as penalty surcharges against 6 air purifier manufacturers for unfair labeling and advertising (Aug. 2018).
② False advertising of Audi Volkswage
The KFTC imposed penalty surcharges against the unfair labeling and advertising practice of Audi Volkswagen (Jan. 2017).
The KFTC may publicly notify matters that business entities, etc. shall include in labeling or advertising to expand the scope of information that will be provided to consumers for reasonable selection of commodities, and to prevent consumer damage occurring due to lack of information.
Failure of disclosing the fact about providing material benefits
The KFTC imposed sanctions against Instagram influencer advertisements (Nov. 2019).
The KFTC is authorized to order a business entity to temporarily suspend unfair labeling or advertising, where the relevant labeling or advertising is likely to cause irrecoverable damage to consumers or rival business entities, and thus prevention of such damage is deemed urgently required.
Consumer 24 WebSite(http://www.consumer.go.kr)